DaveS Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 At least for the time being . Last night I had a go at getting another 9 RGB subs in Bin 2 G2v calibration to add to the 9 I had captured earlier (A lot earlier lol). The 18 subs were stacked in AstroArt 8 then cropped to remove alignment edges and gradient reduced. After DDP they were combined into a RGB plate. This had a saturation boost and a *very* slight hue adjustment. After upscaling (Bicubic) it was layered with the synthetic luminance captured last year in Bin 1. No further adjustments were made (Or needed?). Although there are a couple of HII jets I found combining the H-alpha data problematic. So unless I'm feeling masochistic enough to capture another shed-load of Hydrogen data and wrestle it into submission I'll park this here. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazAstro Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Looks good Dave, is G2v where you calculate the weights of RGB separately ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveS Posted March 24, 2022 Author Share Posted March 24, 2022 Yep. Roughly speaking take exposures of a G2v star such that it's not going to saturate then measure the intensity of the image in your software of choice. I used Maxim DL as I was using it for capture. Use the same exposure time for R,G,B of course, and take enough subs to stack them in average. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveS Posted March 24, 2022 Author Share Posted March 24, 2022 If I was being more precise I would use different exposures for R and G, but they were close enough that I could use the same value, but B needed 1.75x as much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.