Jump to content

M13 - More data and a brutal cull


Recommended Posts

M13 The Great Globular Cluster in Hercules

 

Added another 1.5 Hrs to this on Wednesday night in windy and mediocre seeing. Bringing total capture over 4 sessions to approx 9 Hours.

This was stacked and brutally culled down to 7 hours in Astro Pixel Processor, using its excellent Analysis Graphs. Then used APP to reduce Light Pollution before passing honours to Pixinsight.

 

Ran a SPCC against the image and then a minor NoiseX before a 'restrained' BlurX deconvolution followed by a full NoiseX.

 

Then ran a Super Hyperbolic Stretch using the BB stretch tools before saving the resulting Tiff file and passing final duties to Photoshop.

 

First a push on Colour Saturation using Image/Adjustments/Match Colour (this is a good tool for pushing saturation without introducing noise/artefacts).

 

Finally, used AstroFlat Pro Plugin to sort out the problems caused by rubbish flats over 4 separate sessions.

 

Tony

M13-Apr21-2023-crop.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that the core is a bit blown, but that is one cracking image Tony! If you tame down the central stretch a bit it'll be absolutely top notch. I love the star colours and perfect roundness right across the whole fov.

Is that NGC6207 at 2.0 oclock? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

After having another go at this I decided that the last hour and a half of capture was just muddying things up.

 

I made the decision to go back to the previous version and see if I could apply a gentle stretch, keeping the core stars just below saturation while trying to bring out the outer parts of the globular.

 

Going to come back to this once the snow-blindness has subsided 😊

 

Tony

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by mightymonoped
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious @mightymonoped, what did you settle on for exposure time?  I was thinking of giving this a go, and maybe using 30 sec subs so as not to saturate the stars and core (per a suggestion from Terry some time back).  Up till now I've been keeping everything consistent, but ready to try tweaking the variables a bit now and this seems like a good one to try.  I can probably get 4-5 hours realistically in one go.

 

Set up is Celestron 8" SCT > .63 reducer > LP filter > ASI294MC Pro.  If I polar align very carefully, I can get < 1" guiding if it is perfectly windless.  Bortle 4-5 area.  What do you think?  I'm inspired by this pic!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam, knowing what I know now, having done around 4 sessions on this in Bortle 4 skies, I would stick to <=120s. The general quality of the subs is better than at 180s and you are not as likely to blow out the core and colour. 
 

Tony

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...