Jump to content

Flaming Star nebula


Padraic M
 Share

Recommended Posts

From last week's play, I've stacked 36x300s H-alpha frames. My 2 hours of RGB lights were unusable. Light pollution almost completely obliterated what little signal was present. City skies with 50% moon just don't suit broadband.

67584318_FlamingStarHa2x2.thumb.jpg.01d8c820ba0e05c87e2c7b2f8e2fdf0a.jpg

On Astrobin here.

36x300s Baader 3.5nm Ha
Esprit 80 with ASI1600mm Pro @ -20C, gain 139, offset 21.
AA Starwave 50mm and ASI290mm Mini for guiding.
Belt-mod HEQ5 Pro.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by: @padraic-m

City skies with 50% moon just don't suit broadband.

I concur with that, but I find I can get RGB provided it is combined with Ha and not Luminance which is total rubbish from Bortle 8.  So this counts out targets with no Ha.

Nice result.

Carole 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I've reworked this image with the RGB data, creating a Ha(HaR)GB image following more advice from Carole. The Ha really boosts the red channel, as you'd expect. I was hoping that the blue reflection nebulosity would show through; it is present faintly in the blue and green channels, but isn't strong enough to show through other than as a grey smudge.

Again, this is 3 hrs Ha, 40 minutes each of RGB for a total of 5 hours integration. DSS, Starnet and Gimp.

1847093391_0Ha(HaR)GB_filtered2.thumb.jpg.eb6cf7db9a36d04b862d81c74f6556d1.jpg

Astrobin

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...