Jump to content
Welcome to Backyard Astronomy Space - please register to gain access to all of our features. Click here for more details. ×
SmallWorldsForum Microscopy and macro photography - a companion forum to BYA ×

m31 with SiriL and GIMP


gabs

Recommended Posts

that is my first attempt using SiriL for staking and preprocessing imaging.

 

The starts were removed using Starnet and add them back once I processed the galaxy itself

 

these is a result of 30 no. 330 sec exposure with a DSLR and quadband clip filter.

 

Comments are welcome , as usual.

m31.jpg

Edited by gabs
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gabs said:

that is my first attempt using SiriL for staking and preprocessing imaging.

 

The starts were removed using Starnet and add them back once I processed the galaxy itself

 

these is a result of 30 no. 330 sec exposure with a DSLR and quadband clip filter.

 

Comments are welcome , as usual.

m31.jpg

The galaxy is definately showing through, good job. Try to keep your colour noise down, I don't how to do that in Gimp, but I'm sure there will be some settings for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AstronomyUkraine said:

The galaxy is definately showing through, good job. Try to keep your colour noise down, I don't how to do that in Gimp, but I'm sure there will be some settings for it.

Hi Brian, thanks for your comment.

 

there is a RGB noise reduction filter which I used in the attached image, however it doesn't seem to improve a lot.

 

I am happy with what I got anyway considering i have never used SiriL and it seems easier to preprocessing the images.

 

I have also managed to take some exposure on the M39 open cluster bit boring target but full of stars 🙂

 

 

 

m31 rev a.jpg

m39.jpg

Edited by gabs
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, gabs said:

Hi Brian, thanks for your comment.

 

there is a RGB noise reduction filter which I used in the attached image, however it doesn't seem to improve a lot.

 

I am happy with what I got anyway considering i have never used SiriL and it seems easier to preprocessing the images.

 

I have also managed to take some exposure on the M39 open cluster bit boring target but full of stars 🙂

 

 

 

m31 rev a.jpg

m39.jpg

M39 looks good. Remove the gradient and it will look even better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AstronomyUkraine said:

M39 looks good. Remove the gradient and it will look even better.

Thanks you!

 

I will try again !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good effort Gabs, seeing the outer regions of M31 but it's quite grainy, almost as if it's been over sharpened.

M39 looks good, not sure what the squiggly dark patch near the centre is.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My how you have come on Gabs since purchasing your EQmount and getting to grips with guiding.  That's a great result for someone at your early stage of imaging.  There looks to be some sort of error with the flats at the top left of the galaxy.  

 

Carole 

Edited by Carastro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Carastro said:

My how you have come on Gabs since purchasing your EQmount and getting to grips with guiding.  That's a great result for someone at your early stage of imaging.  There looks to be some sort of error with the flats at the top left of the galaxy.  

 

Carole 

 

8 hours ago, MarkAR said:

Good effort Gabs, seeing the outer regions of M31 but it's quite grainy, almost as if it's been over sharpened.

M39 looks good, not sure what the squiggly dark patch near the centre is.

 

Thank you both !

 

yes definitely everything can be improve in both images but to my early stage I am happy to see these kind of result.

 

I guess something not quite right happens with the calibration frames.

 

I am thinking to get a light box to do proper flat frames I am using a laptop screen with white light on.

 

so moving forward there should be an improvement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, gabs said:

 

Thank you both !

 

yes definitely everything can be improve in both images but to my early stage I am happy to see these kind of result.

 

I guess something not quite right happens with the calibration frames.

 

I am thinking to get a light box to do proper flat frames I am using a laptop screen with white light on.

 

so moving forward there should be an improvement!

You don't need to buy a dedicated light box, you can make your own very cheaply from an Led light panel like this one.

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Entweg-Copyboard-Dimmable-Brightness-Painting/dp/B08HVCBMX8/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=led+tracing+panel&qid=1634323543&qsid=258-6985037-0409705&sr=8-1&sres=B08HVCBMX8%2CB07SB3CLHH%2CB08GPHLF77%2CB07SRZ4L44%2CB08M9HWW76%2CB08FSWXYTX%2CB08ZXXLWLK%2CB07NYPHX23%2CB08J7YH12B%2CB07B93R956%2CB08K4MVK1B%2CB086D7S75Q%2CB08HQ3PMMK%2CB0875WXDMF%2CB0748CY5CP%2CB07V7FC9KZ%2CB08TMRTD11%2CB0787V2GC1%2CB07GJBF4P3%2CB08K4MZF2K

 

Here is mine made from a similar panel.

 

FlatBox.thumb.jpg.da9e83c55a59ec905c6e38372362ddb9.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Welcome to Backyard Astronomy Space - please register to gain access to all of our features

    Once registered you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You will also be able to customise your profile, receive reputation points for submitting content, whilst also communicating with other members via your own private personal messaging inbox. 

     

    This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Tell a friend

    Love The Backyard Astronomy Space? Tell a friend!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...