Jump to content
Welcome to Backyard Astronomy Space - please register to gain access to all of our features. Click here for more details. ×
SmallWorldsForum Microscopy and macro photography - a companion forum to BYA ×

Stars, stacking, exposure time, Lum / RGB / Narrowband


Demon

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I'd appreciate knowing your experiences as while this sounds like it should be completely obvious and detailed everywhere, I'm struggling to get an decent idea.

I've been doing basic mono with just IRcut filter and just bypassed RGB and going for narrowband filters, about to try RGB and see what I've missed.

However while I can get really good stars with IRcut/no filter, I'm struggling to get nice stars with the narrowband.

I appreciate some of this is down to my field of view being pretty small (if larger then likelihood of having more and brighter stars improves situation/stacking), however while my DSO's are visible I didnt even think stars would be a problem until now.

Most of you guys/gals have beautiful apos that in theory collect less light than my newt, however I'm sure yours will be sharper and therefore the pinpoint stars may actually be brighter, plus your generally doing longer exposures.

 

So my basic question is simply when youre going from lum to RGB to narrowband filters, have you ever notice a significant change in star brightness, or as I more suspect this has likely never even been part of your equation and never had stacking issues for this reason?

 

I think this is also somewhat hidden as most of us have autostretch switched on and we're mainly looking at the DSO's as the images roll in.

I may be completely wrong but I'd appreciate getting an idea of your thoughts and experiences regarding this thanks very much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stars are generally smaller in Narrowband, and the smaller the nm the smaller the stars.

 

Posting some examples might help us to help you better.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Carole, Thats exactly what I'm after even though it sounds like pretty basic stuff and obvious -  much appreciated. Results are likely not going to add to conversation as they are pretty poor for a few other reasons also (slightly embarrassing) - collimation, camera cooling and trying to get to short exposures. but I still think I'm making headway with the beast and happy that filters, filter wheel and coma corrector are working now. Every turn brings a new learning curve and gradually getting everything working together.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Welcome to Backyard Astronomy Space - please register to gain access to all of our features

    Once registered you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You will also be able to customise your profile, receive reputation points for submitting content, whilst also communicating with other members via your own private personal messaging inbox. 

     

    This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Tell a friend

    Love The Backyard Astronomy Space? Tell a friend!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...