Jump to content
Welcome to Backyard Astronomy Space - please register to gain access to all of our features. Click here for more details. ×
SmallWorldsForum Microscopy and macro photography - a companion forum to BYA ×

Grab And Go Mak 127


Scopeman

Recommended Posts

Celestron 127 Mak with electric focuser on Vixen AP2 mount/half pier & tripod for lunar/planetary observing....

20221018_161836.jpg

20221018_161802.jpg

Edited by Scopeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would be your opinion on an Explore Scientific 6.5mm 1.25" eps? I wouldn't go any higher than that and at present my highest power is a TV 8mm Plossl.

Edited by Scopeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Scopeman said:

What woould be your opinion on an Explore Scientific 6.5mm 1.25" eps? I wouldn't go any higher than that and at present my highest power is a TV 8mm Plossl.

 

I have a few ES, although mine are all the old focal lengths. 

 

5sVAMOkl.jpg

 

Mine still get used a fair bit.

 

4UeWrKil.jpg

 

I don't know about the newer lengths. There's nothing wrong with any of them though. 

 

AYPXqYgl.jpg

 

I'm pretty certain they're JOC. 

 

atmPKGjl.jpg

 

They do well in dew as they're filled with kryptonite or something. Although, for lunar/planetary I tend to prefer less than an 80° AFOV as there's less glass and therefore less concomitant problems. Usually I'll use TMB clones at the most. For rich field/deep sky the ES easily hold their own with any other 'premium' EP's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bGjIIdnl.jpg

 

The 8.8mm is outstanding and one of, if not the best of, the range (seen above with added Barlow element). 

Edited by Nightspore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine are mostly ES. 3 TV Plossls, a Radian and a set of Pentax XL's. The ES I am thinking about is the cheaper 52 degrees which will be fine for what I want, I just wasn't sure if I would be pushing the mag too far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Scopeman said:

Mine are mostly ES. 3 TV Plossls, a Radian and a set of Pentax XL's. The ES I am thinking about is the cheaper 52 degrees which will be fine for what I want, I just wasn't sure if I would be pushing the mag too far.

 

I think I briefly owned a bino pair of 52°.

 

gJf6Knh.jpg

 

They seemed fine, although I ended up getting into an argument with Telescope House as one of them showed debris and I had to return it a couple of times. As a consequence I sent them both back and went with WO SWAN's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the Baader planetary set but the lenses are so tiny I don't like them.

Edited by Scopeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scopeman said:

I have the Baader planetart set but the lenses are so tiny I don't like them.

 

Better eye relief/ergonomics might be a plus. I think comfort while observing is important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like Telescope House, I remember taking my 10" Meade SCT there by car to get it collimated, I had it on my lap all the way there and back, the collimation was worse than when I got it home than it was to start with! Never used them again after that and that was years ago now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they lost me as a customer years ago after several issues with returned items. I've been thinking, the 6.5mm will give you 237x on the 127mm. Which is only 17x less than the 257x at an 0.5mm exit pupil. So quite do-able for Mars and some other objects. It's probably a good idea to have at least one eyepiece that gives around an 0.5mm exit pupil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a safe way to get the blackness back on the Pentax's? They are quite old now and turning grey, don't want the rubber to start perishing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Scopeman said:

Yes, I will get it, last one in stock too.

 

Sounds good. If the weather holds you might get a butcher's hook at the 'Pup' (Sirius B) with the 127mm. It's do-able, although Sirius has to be placed well, usually near transit, and good conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scopeman said:

Got a notification that you had replied but there is no reply, have I missed something?

 

Gremlins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Scopeman said:

Is there a safe way to get the blackness back on the Pentax's? They are quite old now and turning grey, don't want the rubber to start perishing.

 

I usually wipe any rubber turning grey with a microfibre cloth. TV eyeguards can do this over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also have put on a very thin layer of renaissance wax and polished it straight off and they look like new again. It must be salts from skin, that will stop it.

 

Edited by Scopeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Welcome to Backyard Astronomy Space - please register to gain access to all of our features

    Once registered you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You will also be able to customise your profile, receive reputation points for submitting content, whilst also communicating with other members via your own private personal messaging inbox. 

     

    This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Tell a friend

    Love The Backyard Astronomy Space? Tell a friend!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...